Can some tell me what is wrong with my page

http://www.progressivegroupalliance.com/services.aspx

In firefox my page is messed up and it will take me a while to figure
it out. So I want to ask an expert what do I need to do to fix it. In
IE it displays 98% correct, but in Firefox it display messed up.

In article
<48a68c81-0fa7-4da8-9d7b-874424b13b02@x41g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
WebArchitect wrote:

> http://www.progressivegroupalliance.com/services.aspx
>
> In firefox my page is messed up and it will take me a while to figure
> it out. So I want to ask an expert what do I need to do to fix it. In
> IE it displays 98% correct, but in Firefox it display messed up.

It looks to me that there is a box that is not growing height to house
floated children (which is not incorrect for a standards compliant
browser). If this is right you need to track it down and take measures.
One measure is to put overflow: hidden; onto it.

Try

This starts to sort the problem out. There are other things too.

You have such complicated css sheets and html, I decline to look deeply
right now...

--
dorayme

WebArchitect wrote:
> http://www.progressivegroupalliance.com/services.aspx
>
> In firefox my page is messed up and it will take me a while to figure
> it out. So I want to ask an expert what do I need to do to fix it. In
> IE it displays 98% correct, but in Firefox it display messed up.

HA! Ha ha haha ha ha. Oh, my.

Dear esteemed OP: I'm sorry, this post won't be of any help to you. I
shouldn't even be replying. I sincerely hope you do not think me rude.


To everyone else: Sorry to be adding to the NG noise, especially for
those who kf GGers, but if you have the time and want a smile you might
look at the code at the URL.

It seems that Microsoft's SharePoint makes Web pages of similar quality
to other fine Microsoft products like Word and Publisher. (OP is lucky
it shows in a non-IE browser at all.)

And... I think that's about all I have to say about that.

--
John
Pondering the value of the UIP: http://improve-usenet.org/

On 2008-09-04, WebArchitect wrote:
> http://www.progressivegroupalliance.com/services.aspx
>
> In firefox my page is messed up and it will take me a while to figure
> it out. So I want to ask an expert what do I need to do to fix it. In
> IE it displays 98% correct, but in Firefox it display messed up.

Go to and check your page for errors.
(There are 147 errors on the page:
)

Fix them; if it is still not working, come back with specific
questions.

--
Chris F.A. Johnson
================================================== =================
Author:
Shell Scripting Recipes: A Problem-Solution Approach (2005, Apress)

WebArchitect wrote:
> http://www.progressivegroupalliance.com/services.aspx
>
> In firefox my page is messed up and it will take me a while to figure
> it out. So I want to ask an expert what do I need to do to fix it. In
> IE it displays 98% correct, but in Firefox it display messed up.

Oh ... my ... God!

I wouldn't know where to start other than to start over.

You're biggest mistake is ...



--
Ed Mullen
http://edmullen.net
If it ain't broke fix it anyway! If it's broke fix it and make it worse!

WebArchitect wrote:

> http://www.progressivegroupalliance.com/services.aspx
>
> In firefox my page is messed up and it will take me a while to figure
> it out. So I want to ask an expert what do I need to do to fix it. In
> IE it displays 98% correct, but in Firefox it display messed up.

What exactly is wrong with it? In Konqueror there seems to be nothing amiss.

Irina

--
"Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth
should that mean that it is not real?" --Albus Dumbledore
http://www.valdyas.org/foundobjects/index.cgi Latest: 02-Sep-2008

In article <48c0d636$0$196$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>,
Irina Rempt wrote:

> WebArchitect wrote:
>
> > http://www.progressivegroupalliance.com/services.aspx
> >
> > In firefox my page is messed up and it will take me a while to figure
> > it out. So I want to ask an expert what do I need to do to fix it. In
> > IE it displays 98% correct, but in Firefox it display messed up.
>
> What exactly is wrong with it? In Konqueror there seems to be nothing amiss.
>

In my last post to OP, I suggested among other hints, that he could look
to putting overflow: hidden on one of the elements that appeared not to
be growing height to house floats, I mentioned the main_box div.

I now come here to tell you, Irina, to take a look in Firefox and him to
look at putting overflow: hidden on his main_indent div that targets the
problem I am seeing a little more specifically.

In other words, from his

to

For IE6, if this sort of thing ever does happen, and it does in some
circumstances but not usually, he will need to "clear" an element at a
point just after the element that hangs outside to notify the parent to
develop the height to enclose the cleared element and, at the same time,
to enclose the element that was unenclosed.

There is some stuff on this at:



--
dorayme

dorayme wrote:

> I now come here to tell you, Irina, to take a look in Firefox

Ah, I see now! I'm so used to Konqueror being *more* picky than Firefox
about styles that I didn't even think of checking in Firefox as well.

(that'll teach me to do both by default!)

Irina

--
"Of course it is happening inside your head, Harry, but why on earth
should that mean that it is not real?" --Albus Dumbledore
http://www.valdyas.org/foundobjects/index.cgi Latest: 02-Sep-2008

In article <48c0e60b$0$191$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>,
Irina Rempt wrote:

> dorayme wrote:
>
> > I now come here to tell you, Irina, to take a look in Firefox
>
> Ah, I see now! I'm so used to Konqueror being *more* picky than Firefox
> about styles that I didn't even think of checking in Firefox as well.
>
> (that'll teach me to do both by default!)
>
> Irina

All the browsers have their little ways. When I first got Safari (on a
Mac, ages ago) I was pleased that it threw a fit if the CSS was badly
formed as often as not. Error correction in browsers is great for users
short term, not so informative for developers.

About your use of "picky", it is correct for a tall floated child of a
container to hang out. The author must do things if he does not want
this to happen.

--
dorayme

On Sep 5, 4:25*am, dorayme wrote:
> In article <48c0e60b$0$191$e4fe5...@news.xs4all.nl>,
> *Irina Rempt wrote:
>
> > dorayme wrote:
>
> > > I now come here to tell you, Irina, to take a look in Firefox
>
> > Ah, I see now! I'm so used to Konqueror being *more* picky than Firefox
> > about styles that I didn't even think of checking in Firefox as well.
>
> > (that'll teach me to do both by default!)
>
> > * *Irina
>
> All the browsers have their little ways. When I first got Safari (on a
> Mac, ages ago) I was pleased that it threw a fit if the CSS was badly
> formed as often as not. Error correction in browsers is great for users
> short term, not so informative for developers.
>
> About your use of "picky", it is correct for a tall floated child of a
> container to hang out. The author must do things if he does not want
> this to happen.
>
> --
> dorayme

I took out the DOCTYPE and it displays good in all browsers. Now can
someone tell me why that is? I thought a DOCTYPE was a good thing to
have.